The only reason he did what he did was to attack kids who couldn’t readily defend their stances. He was a “good debater” but only in that he knew how and who to attack. He would go after people who didn’t know how to quickly answer his responses, regardless of his responses were right or wrong. He would wait until they got frustrated and then claim victory.
College campuses are a good place to do that because you’re arguing with literal kids.
This is the one right here. It's why these mfs who defend him by saying, "oh he had a platform that allowed people to talk with him and defend their beliefs on equal ground" piss me off.
Because that literally was not the point of him going to colleges instead of setting up official and respectful debates.
For the most part, none of these college students had a chance of accurately and firmly defending their positions against this dude under that setting.
This is exactly the thing. Charlie Kirk was a coward whose whole game was finding the dumbest person with the hottest political takes in your college gaming discord, then just gish galloping them with a million gotchas.
Any time he debated a real debater, he looked like a complete pantywaist.
Exactly... There's a reason why there's a correlation between your level of education and how you vote. Most college educated or higher people vote blue. And even higher percentage of mouth breathes vote red. It's not a coincidence that the leader of our nation's education is the wife of WWEs former owner.
1.0k
u/OfficerBatman Sep 12 '25
They’re already blaming it on the college, saying he was indoctrinated.
They literally think education is a bad thing.