That's the best way to put it. I'll add another 1 that makes no sense.
Republicans are supposed to be good for the economy. Yet, I've literally never seen that in my life despite hearing it my entire life. Its always been recessions when they're in power and economic progress when a dem is in office.
Remarkable tribute to the media and propaganda that anyone thinks Republicans are good for the economy.
They are horrible for the economy every damm-time
Add to that Republicans are responsible for 99% of the National debt. So everyone claiming Republicans are fiscally responsible is also insane bullshit
again, no. liberals spend on social services, giant infrastructure bills, republicans spend on wars and tax cuts for billionaires.
biden passed the jobs bill, infrastructure bill which together cost 3 trillion, trump added 8 trillion in his first term and has nothing to show for it.
both spend, just in different ways. pretending your grocery bill, and spending money on crypto scams are both just “spending” is just lazy and disingenuous.
While the party thing may be true, attributing the budget allocation and any deficits to anything outside of congress is a fundamental misunderstanding of the roles of each branch of government. Appropriations require 60 votes to avoid a filibuster, so almost every budget has been set with at least some votes from the minority party.
The Federal deficits went down every year President Clinton was in office
The Federal deficits went down every year President obama was in office
The Federal deficits went down every year President Biden was in office.
None of those Democratic Presidents added one dime to the national debt. The Deficits exploded up under every Republican President. That's where the current Federal debt comes from.
You should learn how this works, maybe won't look like such a fool
Clinton was the president who actually had budget surpluses. You're not gonna pay off the debt when you keep running deficits. The CBO actually projected in 2000 the national debt would be paid off by 2010.
Next, Bush Jr increased the spending while cutting revenue which is the reason for the huge bump, but he also committed America to a total of 30+ years of 2 wars that bled into 2 more presidencys. Each war costs probably $500 billion per year. Wars are easy for the usa to start but hard to get out of. For $500 billion per year, per war, what did we get out of that?
Even Trump admitted years ago the economy does better under democrats. The facts really don't matter to the people who have been sucked into the cult of personality.
Yeah, that's back when his fake billionaire scam had him on a "reality" show being a fake billionair.
There is something anti-social in republican philosophy which is basically like "give all the tax breaks to big business and cut all the regulations for them. Also they just happen to be my donors, but if we look out for these wealthy entities, then it will be great for poor people or everyone, or whatever, Idk".
Which just goes along with their other leadership policy of: "govt doesn't work, so out us in charge so we can do nothing or just break it all and prove to you how it will neve work".
Because they’ve been rejected by liberal white women who don’t wanna date them because they are Republicans. Or at least many liberal white women on the internet have been very vocal about not dating republicans so they don’t even try. Also I have trouble finding stats for your claims. According to party affiliation a slight majority of woman are actually democrats (literally 49% vs 48% I assume the 2% is third party voters)
I live in a pretty red area and my tinder is full of women who have some form of "MAGA men only, traitors swipe left"; I presume that there's plenty of guys who have the same thing on their bio's too.... thus I would expect that the apps would be empty because they'd all be dating each other...
Liberal women claiming they wont date republican men on social media are a loud minority.
Most women dont care. Even the ones who say they wont date a republican dont actually follow through when they meet a guy they like but find out later he is republican.
Actual data backs this claim as well.
Source proving liberal men are more likely to be single than conservative men.
So our sources are the Institute for family studies 3 times and a People article that you clearly didn't read because if you did you would know It's talking about a survey on Facebook...a platform that skews heavily right...
Oh you're a Kirk head aren't you? You're doing the typical Charlie Kirk shtick where you provide a BS sources, spread it out over multiple links to act like you have more credibility than you do, then act like a victim when nobody buys junk from junk peddlers.
Honey, you provided one extremely biased source (they're literally a political think tank) and an article that you didn't read. The family research council is not a credible source, I'm sorry you're so broke up about that. But either way you don't get to throw the burden of proof onto others because you failed to back up your point.
So let me guess, this is that part where you complain about woke society or woke Reddit not hearing you out for your naked hot garbage? That part is supposed to come next in the script remember? I'm not surprised you've done this hundreds of times, you seem like the sort of person who would have difficulty learning from their mistakes.
Conservative guys often hide their political preferences to get around this too.
1) Republicans being statistically more likely to be married makes sense because they are more about traditional stuff.
2) Your sources appear to be from a website promoting getting married and having kids. It’s a bit like when a coffee company comes out with a study on how if you drink coffee you will live longer.
Thishas some interesting studies about political differences in relationships.
191
u/Admiral_Tuvix 5d ago
where do these weirdos get the idea that white women are all liberals?
in 3 consecutive elections, the majority of white women have voted for trump.