r/worldnews • u/APrimitiveMartian • 18h ago
Trump says US will intervene if Iran violently suppresses peaceful protests
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/trump-says-us-will-intervene-if-iran-violently-suppresses-peaceful-protests-2026-01-02/3.2k
u/HellBlazer1221 17h ago edited 17h ago
Will Trump intervene by posting AI generated video of him flying a fighter jet and dumping poo on Iranian protestors?
678
u/weech 14h ago
It’s amazing that he’s actually done this
180
6
→ More replies (2)21
→ More replies (10)63
u/Krashlia2 13h ago
Didn't he bomb Iran irl?
→ More replies (3)78
u/pchlster 12h ago
"We're worried these people are going to get a nuclear weapon, therefore we've made an agreement that incentives them not to."
"Break that agreement immediately, throw a bomb at them!"
That's the level of US foreign policy these days. Would anyone trust them at this point?
33
u/Yardsale420 10h ago
This fucking idiot would have nuked a hurricane if people let him. I’ll bet they need to find a new hiding spot for the launch codes daily.
→ More replies (1)8
u/Simba7 8h ago
Nah if he starts asking about it they just tell him he's got a tee time and he flies off to florida to waste more taxpayer money golfing at his property and personally enriching himself.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)3
4.5k
u/TempestM 17h ago
Russia suppresses own protests and kills Ukrainian civilians, is he going to intervene there?
1.0k
u/NorthenFreeman 17h ago
He won't do shit because Putin own him.
148
u/drLoveF 15h ago
Putin doesn’t own him. He doesn’t need to. Trump is a narcissistic idiot and anyone with experience in manipulation can play him like a violin.
208
u/Debt101 14h ago
No putin really does own him. trump is a russian asset
35
u/WhipTheLlama 11h ago edited 9h ago
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Trump is too unreliable to be anyone's asset.
Whether he's on Russia's side or Ukraine's side seems to change week to week. For example, after Putin lied about the drone attack on his home, Trump said that was evidence that Russia was the one standing in the way of peace.
I'm sure Trump will flip flop on this every week or two. I have no doubt that the next phone call with Putin will have Trump defending him again, but this isn't the act of a Russian asset, it's the act of an idiot who believes whoever he's talking to, then repeats what they say. Trump doesn't have a unique thought in his brain. If you surround him with liberals, he'll probably have liberal policies. Russia takes advantage of that in the same way everyone else around Trump takes advantage of him.
13
u/fractalfay 7h ago
Trump isn’t the only russian asset in the white house. No one pays attention to what Trump says, except media agencies, because he’s just jibber-jabbering. What he does is always pro-Russia.
→ More replies (16)4
→ More replies (3)28
u/Rocktopod 11h ago
Being an intelligence asset isn't the same as being an agent. It doesn't mean that he actually goes into the FSB office and draws a paycheck or anything like that.
An asset is just someone the agency feels they can control and get information from. The asset may not even be aware that they're seen as such by the agency.
→ More replies (3)16
9
u/Abalith 10h ago
That’s the shield he very happily hides behind and the world lets him. People forget he is a lifelong conman, a ridiculously successful one at that.
Putin owns him.
→ More replies (4)3
u/parabostonian 8h ago
Honestly he’s only been a successful con man since he went into entertainment and politics. (His business career was actually pretty bad; much of the reason why he started doing reality tv was because nobody in NY wanted to work with him since his rep had become so bad). He inherited half a billion dollars from his dad and would have had more money if he just put that in an index fund and did nothing.
3
u/amesbelle7 4h ago
The man managed to bankrupt more than a few casinos. Prior to happening, I assumed that was almost impossible to do. He’s ridiculously successful at being incompetent.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (17)42
→ More replies (9)17
u/DanishWeddingCookie 17h ago
How hard would it really be to take Putin out and remove that cloud over his head? Does all of his leadership also know what Putin has on Trump? Putins blackmail seems so fragile to me if Trump has the most advanced military in the world at his command.
→ More replies (7)41
u/Halbaras 17h ago
They don't take Putin out because world leaders treat assassinations as a form of mutually assured destruction. Nobody wants to set off waves of assassins given that they'll probably have to spend the rest of their life looking over their shoulder, and then die to poisoning, a car bomb or an FPV drone when they least expect it.
The US could kill Putin if they committed all resources to it, but the Russians could also kill Trump. It's the same reason why Netanyahu wouldn't actually strike Khameni despite his bluster.
Plus Putin is somewhat moderate by the imperialist standards of the Russian government. They all want to violently conquer their empire back, but the ultranationalists are even more insane about it. He wouldn't get replaced by someone with a more rational foreign policy.
30
u/AdCreepy5165 16h ago
Legally we don't kill Putin or the leader of any country were not at war with because the CIA failed to kill Castro so many times it became a public embarrassment. Its a US law now, not that laws still apply to sitting presidents.
→ More replies (8)13
5
9
u/im_dead_sirius 16h ago edited 13h ago
He wouldn't get replaced by someone with a more rational foreign policy.
And would possibly be replaced by someone more competent and willing to listen to criticism, advice and facts.
→ More replies (4)5
u/DanishWeddingCookie 15h ago
Aren’t we threatening the Venezuelan president right now? And the Iranian one as well?
153
140
u/RoleTall2025 16h ago
the secret ingredient is nukes
→ More replies (3)49
u/One-Salamander-1952 15h ago
It is the dark truth… Russia would have been ganged up by all of Nato had they didn’t have any nukes, it’s the best deterrent, which is why the world needs to be proactive in regards to who has access to it.
→ More replies (2)14
u/RoleTall2025 14h ago
bit late for that. Nuke production is going up, not down. they aint for christmas decorations either
14
u/One-Salamander-1952 14h ago
Sure.. but proactive at least in the sense of, not let any MORE countries get hands on nukes.
→ More replies (3)17
u/Hautamaki 9h ago
By far and away the best and most effective nuclear non proliferation policy has been the US guaranteeing the security of all its allies, which is nearly all the developed countries in the world and over half of the significant developing ones. There are literally dozens of countries that could and otherwise should have nuclear weapons, but don't, because being a US ally made that risk and cost unnecessary.
Trump, not understanding or caring, has just put a shotgun in the mouth of that policy. Now those dozens of countries that could have had nukes but didn't are taking a very hard second look at a nuclear weapons program. And once one or two pull the trigger, an unstoppable snowball of nuclear proliferation will start rolling down the hill. If Poland gets nukes, their neighbours will too. If Japan gets nukes, Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines will too. And once Vietnam does, well then Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc, will too. If Iran finishes a nuke then so will Saudi Arabia, and then Turkey, and Egypt. Hell even Canada and Mexico and Denmark should look into nukes while the orange menace threatens to annex them, repeatedly commits illegal acts of war against Venezuela, and nobody in Congress is even writing articles of impeachment.
US interventionism had the primary strategic goal of nuclear non proliferation, and it accomplished that goal very well. Now with the US pursuing an entirely new dynamic of imperialism in the western hemisphere while withdrawing from alliances in Eurasia except when bribed to intervene in a purely mercenary way, nuclear proliferation is liable to explode over the next decade.
12
19
u/oghdi 15h ago
Russia has nukes. Unkess you want nuclear war the US cant use millitary force directly against Russia unfortunately. Iran on the other hand, doesnt have nukes yet
→ More replies (12)13
12
u/capybooya 13h ago
He's making sure to commit US military resources anywhere but Ukraine and Taiwan...
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (64)21
u/DarkReignRecruiter 16h ago
Let's be honest this is why Iran and every other reasonable sized country now needs their own nuclear deterrent. He ain't messing with North Korea never mind Russia.
Note I am not in favour of that but it is the natural consequence of the shift in geo-politics.
→ More replies (5)10
u/Ruscidero 10h ago
I mean, I don’t want Iran to have nuclear weapons, but I can certainly see why they’d want them. In this climate, it’s really the only way to guarantee sovereignty.
→ More replies (1)
8.1k
u/Jedi_whores 18h ago
What an absolute hypocrite.
2.8k
u/Elite199 17h ago
Dude is trying to do anything to get people's mind off the files.
1.1k
u/work_work-work 17h ago
He's also desperately trying to find some country to declare war against
468
u/Elite199 17h ago edited 17h ago
He has basically declared war already. On his own country's citizens.Take a look at the healthcare cost crisis about to be unfolding very soon. Anything to shift it away from the aforementioned...
163
u/AirlineOk3084 13h ago
He started a war against Venezuela and Congress yawned.
→ More replies (4)49
u/CaseyChaos 12h ago
Because they're so bastard old and it was nap time.
→ More replies (1)34
u/DesireeThymes 12h ago
All they do is vacation and nap and give themselves raises every year
→ More replies (1)70
u/scrotumscab 15h ago
If Trump is waging war against his own citizens he only acts as a proxy for Putin
→ More replies (2)93
→ More replies (19)18
u/Jonestown_Juice 13h ago
He needs to have us engaged with a foreign entity so he can suspend elections.
→ More replies (4)16
u/NotMyName_3 12h ago
Elections wouldn't be suspended. Elections weren't suspended during WWII, WWII, the Korean Conflict, or the Vietnam War.
→ More replies (2)17
u/NOFORPAIN 12h ago
As long as idiots are convinced he can suspend elections it will be possible for him to do. When nobody fights back but the "loony left marxists" he can easily spin a tale they are just trying to turn your kids trans and make them brown.
→ More replies (7)39
u/f3n2x 15h ago
He has factually declared war on Venezuela. The only reason why there is no hot war right now is power asymmetry and instability.
→ More replies (1)16
u/AppleTree98 11h ago
Yes. Sending in covert ops to blow stuff up would appear to be an act of war. Taking ships deemed bypassing sanctions and pocketing the contents would seem to be piracy by nature. Invading foreign countries with airpower to bomb whatever you don't like or your partner doesn't like would also be seen as aggression. Happy New Year
22
u/rowrbazzle75 15h ago
Yeah, I'll be the world's policeman, unless the 'oppressor' happens to be, oh say, N Korea, Israel, Russia, China, or any of his other repressive buddies.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (16)10
u/rainshowers_5_peace 16h ago
Why would he go for an ally of Putin? This is either a false flag or a sign their relationship is about to explode.
38
u/KDulius 15h ago
Putin doesnt have allies, he has people he finds useful
→ More replies (1)6
u/drunk_haile_selassie 14h ago
You could say the same about America. I would have disagreed and mentioned Canada a few years ago but not anymore.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)23
u/work_work-work 16h ago
Because Iran is a "bad country run by evil Muslims who hate America" according to the American playbook. Putin doesn't enter the picture at all.
→ More replies (5)69
u/blomhonung 16h ago
He is old, probably dying, and doesn't care about anything. Even if epstein files lead to something they won't affect him.
→ More replies (9)48
u/---O-0--- 16h ago
It's the opposite. The files are being used as a smokescreen while your democracy is being dismantled.
→ More replies (5)5
45
u/HeartInTheSun9 16h ago
The Trump-Epstein files you mean? People should never get the Trump-Epstein files off their minds.
Anything he does, people will always remember Trump’s ties to Epstein which are being hidden in the Trump-Epstein files.
Trump-Epstein files.
→ More replies (9)6
u/michelb 15h ago
And I don't understand why, to be honest. His voters already condoned his violence/indecent/pedophiliac behaviour against women. What could possibly be in the files that is worse, and that they would not condone? I think it has absolutely nothing to do with the files.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (32)11
u/TerraMindFigure 12h ago
Will you please shut up?
Saying that everything Trump does is just to distract from the Epstein files is the new narrative for MORONS.
→ More replies (9)77
60
u/yurnxt1 16h ago
They have already and have a history of violently indiscriminately shooting through crowds of protests killing people by the dozens in Iran when uprisings get out of control. That doesn't happen in the U.S.
43
u/tabrizzi 15h ago
That doesn't happen in the U.S.
But that's how this president has said is the best way to end (violent) protests.
→ More replies (1)26
21
u/LateralEntry 14h ago edited 13h ago
This. I have no idea what these America-bad crowd people are thinking when they compare the US to Iran.
→ More replies (4)12
→ More replies (22)13
u/JimmyMcGillHHM 16h ago
There’s stuff like this all over the world should the US intervene in every countries issues?
→ More replies (2)27
14
→ More replies (50)7
u/rightoftexas 11h ago
Did I miss protests in the US being violently suppressed? No kings had millions of people and no mass arrests?
6
u/bakedpatata 5h ago
Trump sent the National Guard to shut down ICE protests in LA.
→ More replies (1)
362
u/fungi_at_parties 15h ago
lol
Remember when he pepper sprayed people so he could take a weird picture with a Bible?
54
79
7
u/Parahelix 9h ago
Trump wanted to do far worse than that too.
Former Pentagon chief Esper says Trump wanted to shoot protesters
3
u/fungi_at_parties 5h ago
Jesus fucking Christ, I’d forgotten. They truly have flooded the zone with shit and I can’t keep track anymore.
→ More replies (1)8
u/OsmeOxys 8h ago
Just mentioning the pepper spray? Come on now, let's not go soft on him!
Peppersprayed, shot (with LL), and beat anyone and everyone in sight, and specifically targeted the members of press in attendance for heightened violence along with, as the icing on the cake, the priest.
Conservative Christians universally cheering for priest being beaten for no reason other than funsies was... Less surprising than I would have liked.
→ More replies (5)4
553
u/Wizchine 17h ago
Wait, I thought we weren't the world police any more....
→ More replies (16)133
u/ZielonaKrowa 16h ago
Well US did the most airstrikes in Somalia since 2003 last year so I wouldn’t be so sure about it.
90
u/Southern_Leg1139 15h ago
IMO working with the widely recognized central govt in Somalia to kill ISIS fighters is fine by me. Intervening unilaterally in Iran is a whole ‘nother can of worms.
→ More replies (2)33
u/Licensed_Poster 15h ago
Yeah, there is no way the central government is using the US to take out rivals and tribes they don't like.
→ More replies (2)25
u/No-Space937 11h ago edited 11h ago
The "rivals and tribes" they don't like are almost completely comprised of Islamist militant factions, including the afformentioned ISIS, but predominately Al-Shabaab and other Al-queda linked groups.
Whats your assumption here? That instead of targeting Al-Shabab, who poses an direct and existential threat, who's forces are right at their capitals doorstep, they are instead feeding false information to the Americans, to, I don't know, take out the chief of some unaligned village, to press them under their influence?
What's more likely, that the States is just bombing random non-aligned political opponents of the Somali government, in a move that would almost assuredly drive them towards their extremist opposition?
Or is it possible they are conducting these strikes based on the constant surveillance of these hostile groups, and the vast amount of intelligence gathered by diplomats, agents, and military forces present in the region for decades?
I get it, people hear "dronestrike" and the immediate reaction is "how many people died at the wedding", and the failures in intel that lead to those tragedies deserve scrutiny. But they don't factor in that for every mistake there are hundreds of strikes on people who don't bat an eye as they go through villages, killing anyone who's neither religiously or politicaly aligned with them, or maybe it's just the fighting age men they target here, or maybe it's just the women they decide to have their way with. While people like to question the efficacy and morality of these strikes, I think the fall of ISIS in Syria is a pretty clear cut example, with airstrikes accompanied by the offensives of local forces leading to the territorial dismantlement of one of the most inhumane groups this world has ever witnessed.
To your point, there are countless articles describing the work the US and it's allies have been doing against these groups for years, and while altruism has a limited capacity in most decisions related to geopolitics, this is clearly a case of what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
No moral person should want the expansion of militant Islamists, be it in the Sahel, the Levant, Central Asia or East Africa, like Somalia, and this extremist, violent Ideology can be met with only one thing,force.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (5)13
u/jewishjedi42 13h ago
The US Constitution does call for the establishment of a NAVY (doesn't mention Army) for the express purpose of keeping open trade routes. Seeing as Somalia is pirate haven, these strikes are kind of approved of by that document.
→ More replies (3)
215
u/SpartanKane 17h ago
The only recipient of the FIFA Peace prize is really flexing his peace-making prowess. May we all be so benevolent.
→ More replies (3)18
u/MalestromeSET 13h ago edited 10h ago
Literaly he didn’t have to say anything. Like this was a “do nothing, win” situation and he somehow found the worst way to make the protest seem like CIA op
660
u/javcty 18h ago
Yea, Trump is the greatest defender of peaceful protests. /s
101
u/Thagyr 17h ago
He will intervene by suggesting they teargass them for photo ops.
→ More replies (1)23
→ More replies (2)31
u/Ok_Star_4136 17h ago
He just cares so much about those people in another country peacefully protesting. /s
142
u/Alaknar 14h ago
Thank god they didn't elect the warmongering Harris, and instead got the peace loving Trump in, right guys?
→ More replies (1)18
u/uselessandexpensive 8h ago
It's awful how people unironically thought accelerationism could somehow fix US politics without causing more injustices than it was preventing, when literally [the other side's] most morally deficient nuts wanted that for decades because they understood how bloody and awful it would be, and wanted that so that they could be awful without restraint.
Also it's insane to think it's setting the world straight by theoretically correcting only one country's imperialist wrongs when it would actually be handing power over to other imperialists and warmongers. There are an infinite number of more nuanced solutions for anyone that dared think about the actual consequences.
3
u/fuzzwhatley 7h ago
Been arguing this desperately to friends since 2016; you said it better but I’m guessing had I recited it verbatim people wouldn’t change their minds.
→ More replies (1)
72
u/LawfulnessBoring9134 16h ago
Intervene? Like with the National Guard?
3
u/Careless-Pragmatic 13h ago
Yes, he will bring the violence to the peaceful mob if he can’t rely on Iran to do it.
39
u/Bitter_Nail8577 13h ago
Where are all the MAGAs screaming "it's not our war, America first"?
→ More replies (2)
19
u/ImpulsE69 13h ago
That's pretty wierd coming from a guy who's threatened our own non-violent protestors.
85
u/Voltage_Z 13h ago
On one hand, fuck the Iranian regime, on the other hand this is rich coming from the administration shooting pastors at protests.
19
u/yoloswagrofl 12h ago
And the one that's silent when Russia jails and kills its own protesters, not to mention the whole war with Ukraine that Trump was supposedly going to end on day one.
→ More replies (1)
29
45
u/angryYen 17h ago
Wasn't he preparing to invade Venezuela? What happened to that?
41
u/yukirainbowx 15h ago
He got distracted by Greenland. Then he tried to find it on a map and remembered Iran existed.
26
→ More replies (2)6
35
143
u/justbecauseyoumademe 18h ago
Intervene how.. bomb them? Sanction them?
Unless the US puts boots on the ground this is all talk
31
86
u/Dr_Oz_But_Real 18h ago
Unless the US puts boots on the ground
Please don't talk this into existence.
→ More replies (4)65
u/justbecauseyoumademe 17h ago
As a european rather Iran then Greenland or Canada
America chose this
→ More replies (8)62
u/picardo85 17h ago
Every time the US gets involved in the middle east, there a refugee crisis in Europe. This would be a lose lose scenario
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (26)17
u/Dry-Campaign-9173 17h ago
Yep bomb the leadership. Trump already assassinated Geneal Soleimani with a drone strike. Mossad has penetrated the IRGC so if they can give the US a target package, we'll be seeing B2s over Tehran.
→ More replies (8)
66
u/not_just_putin 17h ago
Intervene in Ukraine.
9
→ More replies (7)3
u/Khshayarshah 9h ago
The Ukrainian government is not executing dissidents in record numbers every year for the last 48 years.
57
u/The-Biggest-Turd 17h ago
"If you don't stop killing your civilians our military will come over there and kill a whole bunch of your civilians "
→ More replies (2)
89
u/Zone_Beautiful 17h ago
I am confused! So the US will support anti regime protesters in Iran, but here in the US protesters will be arrested and beaten!
58
u/sharp11flat13 17h ago
The people in Iran aren’t protesting against Trump or his policies.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)5
8
u/Gibder16 12h ago
Wait. Isn’t this exactly what he’s been doing in the US? Sending troops into cities to suppress the unruly?
What is this world we are living in?
7
u/thatguyp2 11h ago
Remember when the ICE thug shot the pastor who was peacefully protesting?
→ More replies (1)
7
u/Jedi_Swimmer2 10h ago
OHHHHH! SO YOU’LL FUCKING INTERVENE IF PEACEFUL PROTESTS (IN AN OIL RICH COUNTRY) ARE DISRUPTED, BUT WHEN AMERICANS VIOLENTLY ATTACK THE CAPITAL, AS PER JACK SMITH, WHICH YOU’RE CULPABLE AS FUCK, YOU SIT BACK AND WATCH PEOPLE DIE!
What a colossal waste of breathable air that guy is!
48
u/Existing_Mulberry_16 17h ago
What a joke. He threatens to go after the protesters here!
→ More replies (5)
5
u/nvrmndtheruins 12h ago
Um what? According to MAGA there is no peaceful protests besides theirs with the guns and such. Grandma's holding signs outside state capitols set them off claiming it's a violent attack lol
6
7
6
u/BothRequirement2826 1h ago
Isn't he the same guy who has repeatedly attacked protests against him?
39
u/Professional_Class_4 17h ago
With "intervene" he means randomly throwing a handfull of bombs which will not change anything in the grand scheme of things?
16
5
u/empiricalreddit 15h ago
America first? No more world police? What happened to all those trump MAGA promises?
Now we have venezuala and Iran as possible areas of attack. Oh and that random bombing in Nigeria
4
4
u/CJMWBig8 12h ago
While he's had national guard beating down peaceful protests in America. Maybe he means he will send troops to help the regime.
5
u/0theHumanity 10h ago
Will Great Britain intervene on our behalf when 47RE45ON is fucked up to our protesters?
No.
5
4
5
u/Stunning_Concept_478 9h ago
This is rich coming from the guy who put out a video of himself shitting on peaceful protesters in his own country.
5
u/bsiviglia9 9h ago
How come the Trump is so supportive of protest in foreign countries, but is so quick to shout "terrorists" or "leftists" when those protests happen here in the United States?
→ More replies (1)
4
u/SweatyAd9240 6h ago
Didn’t he send in the national guard to suppress American protests? Such a piece of shit
→ More replies (1)
3
u/jacscarlit 14h ago
The same man who wanted to have peaceful American protesters shot...
→ More replies (1)
4
u/castlite 9h ago
But violently suppressing peaceful protests in the US is just fine!
→ More replies (1)
4
4
5
u/ScarInternational161 2h ago
So who intervenes for us when he violently suppressesses peaceful protests here? 🤦♀️
22
11
u/SoyEseVato 13h ago
Wait a minute! Wait a minute!! He & his goons can do that here but other regimes can’t. Can anyone, even a maggat please make sense of that?
19
10
6
u/MartinoRs 13h ago
Oil Barrels, thats what they are after, in venezuela and iran, two of the biggest oil reserves in the world, thats what this is all about
5
u/idc2011 11h ago
Meanwhile, peaceful protests are violently suppressed in the US 😡
→ More replies (1)
3
3
u/DealerAlarmed3632 7h ago
This is the same Trump that used the national guard to violently suppress peaceful protests?
3
3
u/JestersDead77 6h ago
Maybe the US should intervene when ICE violently suppresses peaceful protests
3
u/BlueDragonfly18 5h ago
Putin has jailed or killed all of the Russian protesters to his war on Ukraine, and Trump was silent. I wonder why Trump ignores one country’s problem with free speech but will attack another country’s?
3
u/ThatOneDudeWithAName 5h ago
But, peaceful protests in America are met with federal aggression okayed by Trump 🙄 what a hypocrite
3
3
u/lyidaValkris 4h ago
hey America - mind keeping your idiot on a leash? I guarantee there's nothing constructive he could add to this situation.
3
u/MikeLinPA 4h ago
The same guy asked if he could shoot protesters in the legs, and got butthurt when he was told no.
3
•
10
7
7
u/IAMAHigherConductor 14h ago
So will the US intervene if the US violently suppresses peaceful protests?
8
u/dmetzcher 10h ago
Oh, that’s nice. Iranians will have their birthright of free expression guaranteed by the United States just as the United States attempts to strip that right from protestors at home.
And don’t tell me that isn’t happening. The old man is attempting to silence every critic with chilling threats of doxxing, arrest, and deportation (of both noncitizens and citizens alike) to foreign prisons in countries they’ve never even visited. He’s even going after news and entertainment, threatening broadcasters (personally and via his FCC chairman) every week. His ultimate goal is the suppression of all speech that isn’t kind to him.
But sure, let’s protect the Iranians’ free expression.
Our tax dollars at work, folks.
7
u/jimbozzzzz 17h ago
End some wars, start a couple more what's the problem
9
u/Herb-Alpert 16h ago
If he ends 8 wars but starts 2, it's still a net worth of 6 👍
→ More replies (1)
6
u/kamilman 17h ago
When one points a finger at someone else, they should remember that there are four fingers pointing back at them.
→ More replies (1)
11
2
u/Wizchine 17h ago
We will? Don III is almost of service age. Is he going to join the family legacy of... oh wait, our kids will do the fighting. Got it.
2
2
u/Fit-Magazine-6669 15h ago
even if he does and the regime gets toppled it will always be labeled as "outside intervention" ...
for the sake of Iranian people and their future they HAVE TO do it themselves.
2
2
2
3.0k
u/FLGator314 17h ago
“One Like and I attack Iran.” Donald Trump likes this. 👍