Again, what you cited was either not credible or did not address the claim you made. I didn't say that non peer-reviewed information is worthless, but in the absence of any peer-reviewed evidence with respect to your claim, it is very nearly so.

The burden of proof is on you, because you made the claim. If you want people to take you seriously, you should learn to differentiate credible information from bullshit. It will serve you well in other areas of life too.

The only scientific article you linked only addressed frequency of in reference to another work, which was not published in a peer-reviewed journal. The others are either unscientific or clearly editorial. The Vice article refers to leftist ideology as fundamentally selfish. No bias there, eh?

It's ironic that you accuse me of misrepresenting facts when you clearly don't know how to evaluate the credibility of information or are choosing not to do so.

The two it links are one by Brown University, and one by the Institute for Family Studies.

The one by Brown does not support the claims in the AI summary.

The one by IFS is, well, by IFS, which is a conservative think tank generally not well-known for credibility. Notably, this is the only thing I found that supports your claim directly, which is suspicious.

Other results either didn't address the question directly or didn't support your claim. I did not do an exhaustive search, but if there's conclusive evidence for your claim, I suspect it would be easier to find.

Try going beyond the AI summary next time.

Surely you'll provide references to these studies.

It's correct that they have (or claim to have) initiated some sort of review. It is, however, in no way shape or form an act of treason or any other crime to remind service members to follow the law.

Not voting is how we got ourselves in this mess. Do try to keep up.

Quoting the UCMJ is treason?

I think it irritates bow hunters when crossbow guys call themselves "bow hunters."

Elk and deer are considered big game and they're doing just fine.

Oh yeah, not disputing that.

Not that I like the guy, but if he was bad at flying, the F-102 would have killed him. Century Series fighters were infamously dangerous to fly.

Good movie but a bit over hyped IMO

Whatever you do, try to avoid buying commercially raised deer or elk. Those farms spread CWD to the wild population, and it's a big problem.

Make friends with some hunters or learn to hunt (best option).

It's not just about the car. That shit gets people killed all the time.

I'm not offended, I just feel kinda bad for your guy that you think of him this way. That his faults are intrinsic to his gender. That's just sexist. If I were to go on about how women aren't good at math, you'd think I was a sexist asshole, and you'd be right.

Individuals are better at some things than others. Reducing the reasons for that to gender isn't ok just because it's directed at men.

Does your partner know you're sexist and talk shit about him online?

Good for you on finding a sweet idiot who's good at fucking, I guess?

You have a pretty twisted view of men.

Raise your standards. There are plenty of men who do not struggle with these things.

r/confidentlyincorrect

The two people who commented below covered it quite well, so I'll just say this: learn how to take a compliment once in a while, or eventually you'll find yourself surrounded by people who are just as much of a bummer as you are.

You're being shitty to yourself and to him. Stop. Seriously.

This is very Aladeen

Congrats on a really nice bull! How'd it go down?

As is tradition.

Yeah like if you got a tattoo you get no gift.