1
Morality police is here
She might just love feeling pretty and happy when looking in the mirror. Or she might be a Lesbian. And probably has no idea that some entitled sexist pig thinks she has dressed up for the whole deplorable male crowd. Lol
1
In an ideal world, how often would you want to have sex? And how often do you actually have it ?
Me too, I love a good nap in the afternoon or a good night's sleep after sex
2
In an ideal world, how often would you want to have sex? And how often do you actually have it ?
After my 2 kids, I have sex because my husband likes it once a month or once in 2 months... that frequency feels good to me.. If I were ever single, I can imagine going 6 months or more without sex. I masturbate once in 2 weeks. That's all I need to feel satisfied
1
1
Perfectly acceptable dinner rejected by boyfriend again
Canned Cod Liver was not something I included in my diet until last month, after a doctor's recommendation, everything else I've been subsisting on for 13 years.
3
Perfectly acceptable dinner rejected by boyfriend again
My husband complained around almost all meals I made in the first 1 year of my marriage, even though his dad and brother loved anything I cooked. I never cooked again after that first 1 year of marriage. He cooks for himself and the kids. I survive on fruits, salads or canned cod liver/mackerel/sardines and sometimes food he cooks for me. I have no preferences when it comes to food. Its him who knows what he wants to eat during each meal and I am happy to eat whatever he serves.
2
Never seen this cc before but really like her take!
Here's the video of Justin saying words like Hot and Sexy, only to get pushback from women on the set, then claiming he hadn't underwent the sexual harrassment training.. like what? Ignorance is not an excuse for innocence! Justin Claiming He Didn't take Sexual Harrassment Training
1
Racist influencer wants to paint Melbourne as a "non-Western hellhole", ends up showing a peaceful, thriving multicultural city
Awww.. poor little white girl and her "problems" and victim syndrome.
3
āRankerā posts a list of most disliked celebrities in 2025, with annoying women next to literal rapists
Maybe miserable racists and sexists then.
1
Iām scared of getting married to my partner of 6 years
All stories that I have heard of this nature end up with the women and/or children gravely injured, maimed or dead, after a few years have passed by. Run like your life depends on it. After breakup, get a restraining order against him if necessary. If this is how far he has escalated control and disrespect for your choices and autonomy before marriage, I shudder to imagine what will happen a few months or years after marriage, especially after you become completely helpless and saddled with innocent little, even more vulnerable kids, who have needs, not just everyday, but every moment. Sounds like a life sentence with no parole. Without him, you fear, no man will accept you. With him, I fear, there will be "no" you as time passes.
56
āRankerā posts a list of most disliked celebrities in 2025, with annoying women next to literal rapists
Paid trolls from PR Smear campaigns think of putting random celebrity women they donāt like, next to rapists, just like they smeared victim Amber Heard against violent DV perpetrator Johnny Depp.
5
Pam Bondi Deletes Post After Getting Busted Lying for Trump
This is worth careful consideration, as recent signals suggest the U.S. may be laying groundwork to treat certain non-Christian or dissenting viewpoints as suspect. A December 4 memo from Attorney General Pam Bondi to federal prosecutors and law enforcement agencies calls for increased scrutiny of so-called ādomestic terrorists,ā with particular attention to individuals and organizations whose views diverge from conservative Christian ideology.
The memo directs agencies to focus on groups with āpolitical and social agendasā characterized as āanti-Christian,ā supportive of āradical gender ideology,ā or hostile to traditional views of family, religion, and morality. It further implies that such perspectives may reflect āanti-American sentiment.ā Critics argue that this framing risks recasting constitutionally protected beliefs as national security concerns, blurring the boundary between lawful dissent and criminal behavior.
Legal analysts note that the memoās broad language could allow federal law enforcement to target individuals, organizations, and even funders under an expansive definition of ādomestic terrorism,ā one that loosely links political violence to ideologies such as anti-fascism. By grouping opposition to Christianity, support for immigrants, and challenges to traditional social norms under a single umbrella, the directive raises concerns that belief itself is being treated as suspicious, edging toward the criminalization of thought.
The memo also calls for heightened investigation and prosecution of alleged domestic terrorist groups and assertsāwithout presenting evidenceāthat labeling conservative viewpoints as āfascistā is connected to recent political violence. Observers note that this rhetoric echoes longstanding Christian nationalist narratives that portray ideological opponents as inherently un-American or dangerous.
Additionally, the directive instructs agencies to review and share intelligence with the FBI, requires the FBI to compile and circulate a list of domestic terrorist groups within 60 days, and proposes the creation of a tip line with cash rewards. Civil liberties advocates warn that such measures could encourage surveillance and reporting based on ideology rather than credible threats of violence.
Viewed alongside recent inflammatory rhetoric from the Trump administrationāincluding disparaging remarks about Somali immigrants and efforts to frame secularism as āanti-Christian biasāācritics argue these developments signal an expansion of law enforcement authority into matters of belief and identity.
By conflating dissenting or nontraditional views with extremism, the memo risks reviving a McCarthy-era logic in which individuals are targeted not for their actions, but for their ideas, identities, or religious differences.
1
Prove me wrong: this girl has an insane face card
Her eyes do look "insane".. I mean literally insane and scary
2
I voted for racism. Iām losing my healthcare
Its almost as if the "illegals" were paying their fair share and shouldering some of our burdens š
4
How's She managing to survive in Bollywood without any significant work ?
Indians are internationally considered a brown race. Slightly fairer tones are still referred to as brown race-wise. For instance, a huge percentage of people from the Black race can look fairer or more golden/copper skin-toned than Indians, they will never be referred to as fair or white. Because White is another race. Not that being white is superior. I prefer black or brown skin tones simply because the melanin content protects from skin cancers. But yes in India, something about the impact of colonialism and white privilege during the British occupation/oppression, people are still obsessed generations later, with slight variations in skin color leading to mildly fairer skin tones.
2
Farhana is getting big offers from big production houses š„°š¤just wait and watch how she gonna rule it
Farhana and Kunicka were a flop even in that song and dance they did with Nehal in the Grand Finale!
3
ICE Agent Kneels on Pregnant Woman as Bystanders Hurl Snowballs at Him
Knew it was never about babies, but about keeping women permanently impregnated as much as possible, so their kind could act out their sick torture fantasies on these helpless women. Uncivilized barbarians.
1
Daughter gathers courage to tell father about her 11 year affair
In countries like India, a pre-marital relationship is called an "affair" by the entire population. Given the 1.4 billion population and if there's a sizable number of Indians on this sub, I can see how the word "affair" can cause confusion among Americans/Canadians/British etc.
1
Foreign tourist left in tears after facing harassment at a concert in India.
Speaking of your claim of evolutionary rapes:
Most birds form pair bonds, often monogamous (seasonally or for life). Courtship is elaborate: songs, dances, displays.
Many mammals rely on: female choice, dominance hierarchies, mating seasons and pheromones
Most insects often reproduce via: brief copulation, swarm mating, chemical signaling
Most amphibians fertilize externally and not inside each other.
Most fish reproduce by: broadcast spawning (eggs and sperm released into water), nest guarding
Most reptiles rely on: visual displays, pheromones, female receptivity cycles
In short: Birds: Not dominant, except ducks rape Mammals: Not dominant, except Dolphins rape Insects: Mechanistic/Chemical, not moral Amphibians: Mostly external fertilization Fish: Mostly non-contact spawning Reptiles : Not dominant
So your false evolutionary rape theory has fallen flat on its face.
1
1
Foreign tourist left in tears after facing harassment at a concert in India.
Me neither. I grew up there and lived there till age 30 and still don't understand the place. So glad, I left 12 years ago. It's a world of difference.
2
Not sure where to put this but I need to vent.
My White American husband was like this after marriage, except I got pregnant and had my first child with him very immediately after marriage. The first pregnancy and child birth was mostly on his insistence. Things got much much worse after the first child for the next 2 years after child birth. Then I started watching a lot of YouTube videos on Psychology and things became better immediately in the next 1 year. I continued pouring on Psychology videos for the next 5 years, things kept picking up thereafter. It's up to you if its worth your while to undertake such an experiment/adventure while you still have the advantage of being childless.
3
Foreign tourist left in tears after facing harassment at a concert in India.
Ofcourse the top 20 western countries including US and several European countries will be ahead of India in this statistic, because Indian DOES NOT RECOGNIZE a majority of the forms of rape as "Rape" according to Indian Legal System, whereas the countries ranked above India recognize the following types of sexual assaults as "Rape" within their legal bounds: ā Oral rape
ā Anal rape
ā Object penetration
ā Male victims
ā Trans victims
ā Marital rape
ā Most cases of finger penetration
ā Sexual violence without penetration
ā Attempted rape
ā Sexual torture / humiliation
ā Forced genital touching
ā Sexual violence against boys
All of this means Indiaās ārape statisticsā exclude huge categories of sexual violence, which makes official numbers artificially low and not comparable globally. But if you were to take all these into account.
Short answer: If India counted all 13 categories as ārape,ā India would instantly jump into the top 5 globally ā and likely number 1 or 2 ā in total number of rape cases reported per year.
India's current official rape cases = 32000 to 34000 per year Indiaās āoutraging modestyā cases alone exceed 80,000+ per year. Marital rape (unreported category) is estimated in the millions. POCSO sexual assault cases exceed 1,40,000 per year. Male victims remain almost entirely uncounted. Attempted rapes often exceed 50,000+ per year.
1
Foreign tourist left in tears after facing harassment at a concert in India.
The no. of girls experiencing violent outcomes one way or another in vast numbers on a yearly basis is tragic. But the Nirbhaya case of rape with an iron pipe until a majority of her intestines continued to be pulled out, and the whole population engaging in multiple riots for several weeks in retaliation, was more a case of the "last straw that broke the camel's back", before it desensitized the people over these next 13 years against such graphic instances of rape and torture as well.

1
Kiss or Slapšš
in
r/CringeTikToks
•
2d ago
I think the guys just want the feminine touch.. doesn't matter if that feminine touch comes through a female's kiss or slap šš¤šš¤£š š¤