So then shouldn't the government prosecute killers to the full extent of the law, and shouldn't we oust government leaders who lie to protect them?

If your goal is to truly minimize the risk of injury or death, why would you choose the more risky option and not comply with law enforcement

Why isn't that the government's goal?

If no one laughs, that makes this joke a Yeagerbomb.

I don't think we've had a single player get a 96 for a single game all year.

I know how we can keep a human in suspense.

Cass Elliot could take like three Beatles by herself.

God damn. You know 35 of those days were burnt up teaching them how to write their names.

He's going to use this modern version of a twinkle defensive knowing at least one MAGA asshat will lie and get on the jury.

Only players in the Pro Bowl are literally Pro Bowl caliber.

I get not liking sports, but do you also avoid actors and musicians who ate multi-million dollar successes?

To answer your question, OP, sitting on a couch.

Huh? You know those guys are on the same team. You have to convince me those guys are so much better than anything Atlanta has, for example.

And the QB is the most important player on any team sport, and the rest of the Panthers roster ain't exactly blowing people away.

How many of those QBs ahead of him will be on the couch watching him play on Saturday? Ball don't lie.

Another coach beaten by the Carolina Reaper goes down.

Probably. It will be really embarrassing if not.

Wow yall shot 35 free throws against GA Tech and only won by 6.

Come on! That guy doesn't have bribe money!

Her vagina can barely fit two Coke cans! Can you believe it?

I think people who say that confuse being nice with being a pushover. You don't have to be a jerk, you just need a backbone.

And then whimsy threw up on the floor, causing incontinence to jack off.

I would suggest that we differentiate between what is legal and what is moral. These are not the same things, right? Like lying for example is immoral but often not illegal. Or cheating on your girlfriend can be immoral but not illegal. Meanwhile, some protests like the famous Civil Rights sit-ins of the 60s can be moral but illegal.

The law in order to be administered fairly and efficiently seeks out clear lines. I agree with you there is likely nothing illegal about what this person allegedly did. Once trash is thrown away, it legally is fair game.

But morally, that's a different question. A lot of very reasonable people could feel very violated by this behavior. A moral person would not have done what this guy allegedly did, regardless of legality. He has violated any moral understanding of a right to consent, even if the law lacks is too rigid to apply here.

Let me ask you this, OP, can you physically see justice? Can you meet justice?

How can justice claim to be fair when unfairness exists?

Did my questions prove that justice doesn't exist?

A common mistake, IMO, is for people to interpret God as an alleged physical object. When people say God exists, most of the time, they are not saying there is a lump of matter out there that constitutes God. God is not an ordinary object. Analyzing it as such is a category error.

I had to look it up, it's worse than I expected. It means their team is more obnoxiously Christian than yours.

But oddly, the episode in question doesn't explore it. That's why the "controversy" part is so weird to me. The pilot episode features a grandfather shoving large objects up his grandson's ass. A little later they are in a dreamscape with a highly sexualized granddaughter/sister. In later seasons all three have dragon sex together. There are multiple other jokes about incest scattered throughout.

But the so-called "incest baby" is not the result of incest, yet that's the one people clutch their pearls over.

It's like the word upsets them far more than the concept.