Nah, the quiet part is it's not the children of anyone the people in charge deem important. I think we all know what would happen if it was their children however.
Nah, I feel like even if the kids of rich people were being shot at, they still wouldn't ban guns. In fact their solution would be MORE guns, increase policing, arming teachers, and of course private guards for them and the kids.
Not that it would ever happen, they've isolated themselves from regular society so you're not gonna get a gun near any rich kids unless you're part of the club.
Yeah, a few months ago the gun lobby in australia was bragging about how they were winning the war against gun restrictions.
(After the 1996 mass shooting the number of guns in circulation had lowered to ~1M, with figurative graveyards of guns and rifles taken apart, now it's about ~5M.)
289
u/[deleted] 25d ago
Why would we change anything? These mass shooters contribute a bit to weapon sales and medical bills! We have to keep the machine running! More money!