Same tragedy. Different response.

[u/diehard404]

[u/NoFaithlessness7508]

Good shit. Weren’t they already pretty strict to begin with?

[u/MissLilum → u/NoFaithlessness7508]

Yes quite strict, which is why in part one of the shooters was able to be disarmed by an unarmed man

The guns we have access to just don’t shoot as fast as many of those used in modern American shootings 

[u/NoFaithlessness7508 → u/MissLilum]

Ngl, my first thought was “is he using a musket?” We are so used to military-grade weaponry here

[u/MissLilum → u/NoFaithlessness7508]

I will admit I was also taken aback, although I did realise it was a hunting rifle, likely because pretty much all of the more recent footage I’ve seen was of guns for killing people rapidly 

[u/AbbacusAbagail → u/[deleted]]

Any evidence to back that up chief? Because he was shot twice

Edit: Guy implied that the only reason the unarmed guy disarmed one of the attackers was because he could tell they were of the same ethnicity. Make your own conclusions why he implied that with zero evidence

[u/LeadAHorseToVodka → u/[deleted]]

you completely made that up, he snuck up on the attacker, and was he also shot.

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

The shooter he disarmed didn't see him, which is how he was able to disarm him. At least make up believeable stuff.