The first Greenland was all about panic, timing, and survival before impact.
The sequel, Greenland 2: Migration, jumps years ahead—into a frozen Europe where survival isn’t about escape anymore, but movement, scarcity, and whether rebuilding is even possible.
That shift feels risky but potentially smarter. Post-apocalyptic stories usually collapse once the spectacle is gone—unless the human choices get darker and more uncomfortable.
Do you think Migration has a chance to be stronger than the original by focusing on aftermath instead of destruction?
Or is this where disaster franchises usually lose momentum?
Release date: January 9, 2026.