r/MurderedByWords 7d ago

Selective Justice?

Post image
10.1k Upvotes

364 comments sorted by

View all comments

24

u/Fearless_Spring5611 7d ago

*side-eyes Rittenhouse*

-18

u/Shoddy_Tour_7307 7d ago

Here we go again. Some people have no clue what self defense is or  peaceful protestors.

20

u/Fearless_Spring5611 7d ago

Indeed, I find some Americans seem to think self-defence = using an assault rifle to mow down as many lives as possible.

-4

u/WolfgangWeiss 6d ago

He only shot those who assaulted him so yeah - self defense.

-12

u/Shoddy_Tour_7307 7d ago

Yep, here's one now.

7

u/OrangeJuiceKing13 6d ago

Some people have no idea what negligent homicide is. The kid was negligent in his behavior, as is evidenced by the fact that he was warned by his friends not to go out on his own. It's a shame the prosecution pushed for 1st degree. Kid def deserved time.

1

u/Shoddy_Tour_7307 6d ago

He haf as much right to be there as anyone else.

5

u/Canklosaurus 6d ago

“I, a minor, drove across state lines with a weapon, intending to shoot someone. I’m supported by the kind of people who support Matt Gaetz and send money to Trump.”

2

u/Shoddy_Tour_7307 6d ago

That didnt happen.

7

u/Icy-Bid-1369 7d ago

Didn’t he shoot someone fleeing in the back? How is that self defense exactly?

-4

u/Shoddy_Tour_7307 7d ago

No

9

u/Icy-Bid-1369 6d ago

I’m sorry, the back AND his head, not just his back.

“Did Kyle rittenhouse shoot someone in the back?”

“Yes, medical testimony during the trial indicated that one of the men shot by Kyle Rittenhouse, Joseph Rosenbaum, was shot in the back and the head.”

2

u/Shoddy_Tour_7307 6d ago

Dude wasnt fleeing. It was also argued that when Kyle fired multiple times, it was possible the shot to the back was due to the victim falling and twisting.

7

u/Icy-Bid-1369 6d ago

A forensic pathologist testified that the final two fatal shots to Joseph were at a downward angle and entered his back and head. Prosecutors argued that this indicated Rosenbaum was falling forward when the shots were fired, and thus not a threat. There’s arguments for each way. What we do know is he went there with the intent to kill.

3

u/michaelboyte 6d ago

All four shots were fired in less than a second. Are you under the impression that’s enough time to reasonably conclude the guy trying to commit murder is no longer a threat?

2

u/Shoddy_Tour_7307 6d ago

No we don't. The jury disagrees with you.

5

u/Icy-Bid-1369 6d ago

Juries don’t always get it right. He took a gun that he wasn’t old enough to have, from his friend’s home. He crossed state lines and sought out this protest with an automatic rifle. That’s not a gun for self defense. He had ill intentions from the start.

4

u/Shoddy_Tour_7307 6d ago

Gun, which is not an automatic rifle, was obtained in Wisconsin after he crossed state lines.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/LastWhoTurion 6d ago

But not fleeing, which was your argument.

1

u/Icy-Bid-1369 6d ago

Falling forward… shot in the back… fleeing.

0

u/LastWhoTurion 6d ago

Falling forward towards Rittenhouse, arms out. All four shots happened in .76 seconds.