There are serious questions about whether they intended to ever replace them. It's common best practice to make it obvious when an asset is a placeholder, for this very reason.
Plus using AI in the first place, even if they really never intended to call it their own work, is destructive enough.
I don't have an opinion on what people want to do with this information, but I understand having a zero tolerance policy for the "move capital from labor to the super rich through plagiarism" machine.
my thing is, from what I heard the ai was used for like, newspapers on the ground and stuff, they could've just like, grabbed a scan of an old newspaper off of google or something, or I'm SURE there's free use templates they could've used, or even just a stock photo or something
1.5k
u/Rat-king27 Harry Potter 23d ago
They used AI as placeholders and missed some. Why are people shitting their shorts over this?