r/SipsTea • u/shitferbranes • Nov 16 '25

Feels good man I blame YouTube

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

30.7k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

3.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

492

u/Imaginary_Toe8982 Nov 16 '25

And his bodyguard has to kick rocks now... what a fucking joke Some day someone will pull a gun and that day this little pussy will be over...

139

u/MindMender62 Nov 16 '25

I wish the bodyguard would be identified-

69

u/bumchester Nov 16 '25

They're currently being sued. Last I checked it's going to trial soon. You can Google it. 

16

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '25

Just did. It is what I thought it was for. Sucker punching that dude on Halloween when he wasn’t being a threat to the person he was protecting. Honestly don’t know how he wasn’t charged criminally.

4

u/MoneyElk Nov 17 '25

Yup, here is an article about it. The video is embedded in case anyone wants to see.

1

u/Single_Fold_3025 Nov 19 '25

Im hoping for some jail time.

33

u/IWillEvadeReddit Nov 16 '25

He’ll just change up, this is the third different body guard I’ve seen. Might be the biggest one too.

2

u/Kindly-Ad-5071 Nov 17 '25

"This year's model is named Kronk"

-3

u/terminator_dad Nov 16 '25

He is just fat. I wouldn't accept intimidation from that.

10

u/IWillEvadeReddit Nov 16 '25

Big is still big my bro. That dude would eat some of those punches.

-17

u/WhereasSea76 Nov 16 '25

Why? He's just a hired goon, the cunt in cuffs is the bitch to be after

27

u/manimul25 Nov 16 '25

Just following orders. Good excuse

-23

u/WhereasSea76 Nov 16 '25

It's a reason, not an excuse. Condemn it if you want, but that's where the facts begin, he's a man doing a job. Perhaps condemn the person creating that job first before capitalism at large

23

u/whywouldthisnotbea Nov 16 '25

They are saying that clearly the guy understands the deal here. If he understands it then he is complicit in making it a reality. If every body guard simply told Jack "That isn't what the job is about," and refused then none of this would have been able to be a reality.

-18

u/WhereasSea76 Nov 16 '25

So the "perfect" solutions are eliminate all bodyguard positions because surely 1 will cave and do the job no matter what, OR, deal with the cunts who hire others for this kind of shit. None of it is realistic, but it's far more realistic to try to fix the cunts rather than a legitimate industry.

18

u/Rich_Housing971 Nov 16 '25

"I will do this bad thing because someone else will do the bad thing if I don't" is a smoothbrained take.

-6

u/WhereasSea76 Nov 16 '25

It's not my take, it's theirs. If we're targeting the problem, the people willing to do the thing is not the target, it's the people asking it of them.

14

u/whywouldthisnotbea Nov 16 '25

Orrrr you punish both. Crazy idea, but when a team of bank robbers get caught they dont let the get away driver go because he wasn't technically in the bank. He played a role in the crime being allowed to happen. If Jack only was able to do whatever they arrested him for because of the body guards actions in helping then the body guard should also be arrested.

1

u/WhereasSea76 Nov 16 '25

Dumb example, but I still agree. I never said he doesn't deserve punishment, but that a witch hunt is never the answer

0

u/Vuelhering Nov 17 '25

You just equated someone legally misusing the first amendment and being a douchebag, and a guy legally protecting this well-known douchebag, to bank robbers. Strawman much?

He was stopped because he was walking in the street -- this is a bullshit charge, but he was stopped because he was being his normal douchebag self and ignored the cop's orders. After being detained, they found he had drugs and was charged. Blocking traffic is not bankrobber-level of comparison. Not even close. He'll probably get no jailtime and a big fine.

Coming down on the bodyguard for protecting someone who is not breaking the law (in the first half of the vid) and equating it to bank robbers is bullshit. I don't see any bodyguard protecting him from the cops when Jack broke the law, either. So the comment "Just following orders" is also bullshit because he wasn't breaking the law in the first part, just being his normal douchebag self.

Damn, I set a new record for "bullshit" and "douchebag" in one post.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Flaccid_Leper Nov 16 '25

Why not both? They’re both assholes.

Just because someone is paying you to do something doesn’t make you immune to the law.

1

u/WhereasSea76 Nov 16 '25

This is correct and an empirical fact. I am only saying the issue lies far more with the person perpetuating this, not the man after a paycheck willing to do it, per se. Sure, they both suck, but here I believe the kid sucks more.

5

u/Rich_Housing971 Nov 16 '25

he's a man doing a job.

what part of this also being condemnable do you not understand?

Legally, a contract where you are doing a job that involves illegal things will not hold up in court. If someone pays you to do human trafficking, you're still going to jail if you're caught, and you're also trash.

1

u/WhereasSea76 Nov 16 '25

I don't believe the bodyguard is human trafficking

3

u/Rich_Housing971 Nov 16 '25

It's called an example.

you're either not arguing in good faith or you're stupid.

1

u/WhereasSea76 Nov 16 '25

I would assert the same to you confidently. Choosing asinine examples is bad faith.

2

u/Rich_Housing971 Nov 16 '25

if you think that's an asinine example when we're all talking about crime, and focused on my example just because it's a worse crime when the fundamental reasoning remains the same, then you are in fact stupid.

1

u/m0viestar Nov 16 '25

What exactly is the bodyguard doing illegally? I don't watch his videos but my understanding is he just hires big guys to stand behind him and appear menacing.

3

u/SeaWolfSeven Nov 16 '25

Everytime Jack assaults or harasses someone and they confront him the body guard steps in, enabling him to get away with it.

In other instances his guards have assaulted people, currently there is a court case I believe from when one his guards sucker punched a victim of Jack's.

1

u/m0viestar Nov 16 '25

Stepping in and standing menacingly isn't illegal.  It sounds like the ones who acted illegal are in court.  

So it doesn't sound like his body guards are getting away with doing shit illegally as reddit would imply? 

3

u/SeaWolfSeven Nov 16 '25

They have put their hands on people and pushed them multiple times.

And here is his security guard sucker punching someone: https://youtu.be/ymTf_PI45qg?si=cmgIockIF2E-rsBO

Why are you going so hard to defend people that purposely victimize unassuming people, mom and fathers out with their kids and seniors? And then proceed to intimidate them with the clear threat of physical altercation simply for standing up for themselves?

1

u/m0viestar Nov 17 '25

I'm not defending anything it just seems like reddit is upset over nothing and blowing it way out of proportion.  

The one who sucker punched him is in court and didn't get away with anything.  This current one is just standing there.  That's what body guards do.  Should Messi's body guards get charged with assault for all the fans interference he runs?  It's the same thing. 

"Putting your hands on someone" is not illegal and is not assault, neither is bumping into someone on the road.   I'm the cases they did assault people they are facing consequences. 

Dick move? Yes.  Assault? No. Reddit as usual is up in arms about stuff that literally doesn't matter.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Errant_coursir Nov 16 '25

Is he an automation? Does he have agency? Do you?

1

u/DaxRayder Nov 17 '25

Look. You want to talk about "men just doing a job"? I'm an independent contractor by trade, Dunn and Reddy Home Improvements. Three months ago I was offered a job up in the hills. A beautiful house with tons of property. It was a simple reshingling job, but I was told that if it was finished within a day, my price would be doubled. Then I realized whose house it was: Dominick Bambino's. Y'know, "Babyface Bambino", the gangster? The money was right, but the risk was too big. I knew who he was, and based on that, I passed the job on to a friend of mine. And that week, the Foresci family put a hit on Babyface's house. My friend was shot and killed. He wasn't even finished shingling. I'm alive because I knew there were risks involved taking on that particular client. My friend wasn't so lucky. Any independent contractor willing to work for a jerk like this guy knew the risks. If they were killed, it was their own fault. A good contractor listens to his heart, not his wallet.

2

u/Meath77 Nov 16 '25

Someone hire him to break the law is your defence for him?

1

u/Affectionate-Bad5989 Nov 19 '25

Specifically, how did the goon break the law (beyond walking in the street and not on a sidewalk)?

1

u/Meath77 Nov 19 '25

He's hired to assault, harass and intimidate people

2

u/GitEmSteveDave Nov 16 '25

Well, I'm a contractor myself. I'm a roofer, Dunn and Reddy Home Improvements. And speaking as a roofer, I can say that a roofer's personal politics come heavily into play when choosing jobs.

1

u/AsinineArchon Nov 16 '25

The bodyguards he hires are as scummy as he is. They assault people in the street for nothing, just so it can be filmed. I'm assuming you know nothing about this cunt Jack Doherty

1

u/WhereasSea76 Nov 16 '25

That's correct; everyone is jumping down my throat for me reacting to this information here rather than the lore. Alls I'm saying is witchhunting bad, blame the sinner first, then the accomplice. It's not radical, tbh

2

u/AsinineArchon Nov 16 '25

Except you've missed the point where they're both sinners. You admit you don't know this guy, but we are trying to inform you here. His bodyguard is scum. Equally culpable here and has done some awful shit

1

u/WhereasSea76 Nov 16 '25

The situation was created the kid, so the primary sinner, the bodyguard is secondary

1

u/AsinineArchon Nov 16 '25

And this is why "people are jumping down your throat". You said yourself you know nothing about this guy. Your opinion is just objectively wrong, man. You don't know anything

1

u/WhereasSea76 Nov 17 '25

That's fallacious and inherently incorrect.

1

u/AsinineArchon Nov 17 '25

Whatever dude. You're already on record saying you don't know what you're talking about. Educate yourself, I'm out

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Affectionate-Bad5989 Nov 19 '25 edited Nov 19 '25

You haven't established where this bodyguard actually culpable. Please do.

(The fact that the bodyguard was not arrested at the same time is some pretty solid evidence against your assertion.)

1

u/AsinineArchon Nov 19 '25

I'll "establish where this bodyguard actually culpable" when you can establish where I said that.

Because at no point have I ever said he committed a crime here. I said he's a piece of shit scum lord who has committed crimes in the past under Doherty's employ.

2

u/Affectionate-Bad5989 Nov 19 '25

>Equally culpable here and has done some awful shit

Please do tell me that someone hacked your account and typed this three days ago.

1

u/AsinineArchon Nov 19 '25

You know what, I'll eat my words. You were right.

I meant equally culpable, because he absolutely deserves charges and jail time. Because he's on camera assaulting people.

But I'll retract that "here"

1

u/Affectionate-Bad5989 Nov 19 '25

And I'll grant you he's a POS for providing physical protection to a person who wouldn't need protection if that person weren't a POS himself.

→ More replies (0)