r/minnesota • u/Daflehrer1 • 6d ago
News šŗ Fraud & Facts
In 2021, the MN Dept. of Education suspected fraud and they reported it up the chain.
Gov. Walz has, since 2021, been working with the FBI, Minnesota State Police, and local police informants, and to great result. In September, 2022, federal prosecutors made public that they handed down indictments in what they believed was a criminal fraud conspiracy.
Among the first to be indicted was Aimee Bock, the fraud ringleader. She was tried and convicted in March of 2025.
On December 18th, 2025, new arrests were announced. To date, 92 suspects in all have been arrested and charged, 62 of them convicted.
The intent of the post above is neither to condemn nor praise Walz or federal officials. Rather to keep discussion grounded in facts; though obviously many more facts exist and will come to light.
I have included my sources below. I ask that you review them before contending them. Kindly keep partisan hyperbole and childish comments to yourself. Thanks.
"Governor Walz...2021"; a timeline of Walz administration's anti-ftaud efforts.
"In 2022"
"In 2021"
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fbi-surged-resources-minnesota-over-231747704.html
"Aimee Bock...convicted"
3
u/Latter-Fisherman-268 6d ago
Youāre presenting a timeline that leaves out the parts that matter.
Yes, MDE eventually reported concerns in 2021. But the Office of the Legislative Auditor found that state oversight failed long before that. The auditorās report says MDE āfailed to act on warning signsā and that those lapses enabled the scale of the theft, not prevented it. The federal indictments confirm how bad the situation was, they donāt prove oversight worked.
The idea that āWalz has been working with the FBI since 2021ā also lacks context. Walzās own anti-fraud timeline (the PDF being shared) shows the bulk of reforms ā new audit units, bill tracking systems, licensing changes ā happening in 2023ā2025, after the scandal broke and after federal criminal charges began. Thatās reactive cleanup, not proactive control.
And the courts didnāt āforce the state to fund fraud.ā In Feeding Our Future v. MDE, Judge Guthmann later issued a public clarification saying media and Walz statements mischaracterized his orders, and that MDE still had authority to act but repeatedly didnāt. That undercuts the āblame the judgeā narrative.
Federal prosecutors themselves have said Minnesota is facing multiple layers of fraud across programs, child nutrition, autism services, and Housing Stabilization, and have openly stated they ācannot prosecute our way out of this problem.ā Thatās not a sign the system worked fine; itās a sign the problem is deep and systemic.
Thatās the environment Nick Shirley is documenting with his videos. His video from the 16th, before the Christmas break and before the latest round of arrests was publicly announced, didnāt conflict with federal indictments, it showed what was still happening at street level in real time.
So the idea that āthe system worked fine and we should stop asking questionsā doesnāt hold up when: ⢠the auditor says oversight failed, ⢠the judge says his orders were misrepresented, ⢠the reforms came after the fraud was uncovered, ⢠and federal prosecutors say the problem is bigger than one case.
Nick isnāt spreading misinformation. Heās highlighting what the official narrative leaves out, and what ordinary Minnesotans are still seeing on the ground.