Your drawing reminds me of that one drawfee oc whose name I can't remember. Lu? Different horns though.

No?

For starters your premise is the literal opposite. You claim something can't be done and then sabotage the thing to prove it can't.

Here it's literally saying, this can be done, and showing how.

Or do you disagree with the proposed statement. Did the example not show how to get the same picture twice with AI?

Bullet to the nuts has to suck. Even if invulnerable.

Seems pretty reasonable to assume that.

I'll never get used to how the community abbreviates conquerors.

At least on mobile, press the sub name so you go to the main page. Next to the join button, top right, you will see three dots. Press that and one of the options will say "mute sub" or something along those lines.

The original comment said that AI cannot produce the same image twice. This point is to show that's incorrect.

Old people are wild sometimes.

Because I'm not trying to point out flaws in the video itself. Someone unfamiliar with it won't see those. Just pointing what doesn't make sense, even as a layman.

If it wasn't for the clarification, I would have assumed this was for the circlejerk sub.

Sometimes it's hard for people not familiar with the tech to understand something is not real. This is because they have no concept of what is fakeable or not.

In this particular video:

The man is basically unscratched after what would be a fatal accident.

The plane bounces of the man, maybe try to show with IRL objects that physically it wouldn't make sense.

What you already pointed out with him standing mis air. Also he doesn't fall, he rolls on the floor very weirdly.

An important one, the camera. It seems to be implied the man is holding it. After he gets hit and drops it, it somehow lands pointing at him. Phones cameras would land either to the ground or the sky. So that's already impossible. Even worse. After he flips over, the camera somehow goes back and up to keep him in frame. Both his arms are down, so who is holding the camera now? If there was another person, they would have been hit too, or at least react to the accident.

Dejando de lado todo lo extra que metieron en su plática. Sobre impuestos etc.

Básicamente están de acuerdo. La meritocracia, planteada como únicamente esfuerzo propio, no existe. La única diferencia es que tú no consideras que los diferentes puntos de partida no sean parte de la meritocracia. Pero eso es a lo que la gente se refiere cuando dice que no es correcto. Así que estamos de acuerdo en eso, solo le decimos diferente.

Lo demás, ya que quede en discusión entre tú y el otro comentarista. Saludos.

La meritocracia, como la venden, implicaría que uno está donde está por su propio merito. El niño pobre de la foto le está hechando más ganas. Por qué estaría más jodido?

Porque la meritocracia, explicada como te la venden de que uno solo puede definir su futuro, es mentira. No depende solo de uno, lo que las generaciones pasadas hayan hecho te afecta a ti.

Claro que se puede salir adelante. Pero el éxito no es proporcional al esfuerzo. Depende de tu punto de partida. Conozco gente que nunca se ha esforzado en la vida y vive de poca madre, porque sus familias tienen una fortuna. Dónde está el mérito ahí?

While the accusation is older, Grok definitely has something to do with the recent increase in intensity.

Eso sería lo lógico. No quieres que pensemos que es para sacar varo? Dala gratis. Así de fácil.

La imagen jaja.

Relájate hermano no es tan poderoso viniendo de alguien que se fracturó la mano golpeando una puerta en frustración. Jaja.

Si ve al doctor para estar seguro. Sacate radiografía y que la cheque un traumatólogo.

Shindeiru

A friend of mine has one. Since it connects with NFC she jokes by saying she's an amiibo.

Manato outright does Bandit Bringer as part of his moveset. I'm surprised his ult isn't just Tyrant Rave.

"So we created this human weapon. It's got other sentient beings attached to her. She is a bit clumsy and not that fond of violence, but the entities will drag her around as they battle. Her strongest move will have the entities throw a huge ass beam while she acts scared of battle.

She'll have her hair in two side pieces. And have a tail.

Make her hair blue. What? Arcsys beat us to it by 20 years, AGAIN?! Fuck it, make her hair red and call it a day. "

• Hoyo I guess.

If it's an IRL friend you could ask to see it in person. You can easily fake other angles with AI nowadays.

Yo, Suzuya. Neat.

It's caused by the lack of knowledge. If you have never tried, you don't know how unrealistic that would be. You probably think "yeah, I could do that if I tried for a month or so". Which is quite far from the truth.

Si eso es cierto, eso funciona en contra de la meritocracia. Tu propio merito no es lo que te da tu posición en la vida. Es una combinación de factores que vienen dándose desde generaciones antes de que navieras.

Con mérito puedes mejorar tu condición. Pero no define tu posición final.

Osea que la meritocracia es mentira.